Truth Triad Diagnostic Micro Case Study: Exmark
A fast, no-fluff example of how the Truth Triad uncovers leverage for heavy-equipment and OPE manufacturers without requiring big rebrands, big budgets, or insider access.
This analysis is 100% outside-in. I’m not affiliated with Exmark or Toro.
It’s simply a practical demonstration of how I evaluate Customer Truth, Product Truth, and Brand Truth to make selling easier in a tough economy.
See how small shifts in story, positioning, and product-truth translation can open big opportunities, even for established brands.
This is the same approach behind my 4-week pilot program for equipment manufacturers.
Four pilot spots remain before the program goes paid at $5,000.
What’s inside (PDF)
You’ll get a breakdown of:
—> Customer Truth: The real jobs-to-be-done driving commercial mower decisions (including assumptions and areas that need validation)
—> Product Truth: What the Lazer Z and Radius platforms are known for, and where messaging may underplay the real advantages
—> Brand Truth: Why “reliable” isn’t enough anymore and the emotional white space brands leave untouched
—> Outside-In Narrative Direction: A hypothesis for positioning Exmark as the “whole-day consistency” brand
(again, no affiliation — just an example of my process)
Who it’s for
Heavy equipment manufacturers
OPE brands
Category entrants expanding into the U.S.
OEM leaders who want clearer positioning
Product, marketing, and sales teams tired of fighting uphill
If you build machines, this shows how to make the story as strong as the steel.
Get the case study
Enter your email below and I’ll send the PDF immediately.
(No spam. No drip campaign. If you want more, you’ll tell me.
DISCLAIMER: This case study is an independent, outside-in analysis based on publicly available information. I have no affiliation with Exmark Manufacturing or The Toro Company, and nothing in this document should be interpreted as endorsement.